Nagi Hanatani vs Elicia Kim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 23 Nov at 12:53 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

N. Hanatani vs E. Kim

Nagi Hanatani
Nagi Hanatani

Flag JPN JPN

w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
Elicia Kim
Elicia Kim

Flag AUS AUS

w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

30
Age
20
-
Height
-
794
C. Rank
0
356
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$5.0K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Hanatani 1 - 0 Kim

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nagi Hanatani winning 2 and Elicia Kim winning 0. The last match between Nagi Hanatani and Elicia Kim was at the W75 Playford, 23-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Nagi Hanatani getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Hanatani1
Kim0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1W75 Playford(11-23-25)

Hard
JPN Flag
Nagi Hanatani
6
6
AUS Flag
Elicia Kim
2
3

N. Hanatani vs E. Kim H2H Profile

Stats
$5,050Career Prize Money$0
44.70% (287-355)Career Total W/L40.43% (19-28)
1Hard0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

N. Hanatani vs E. Kim Match Preview:

  • Who excels in second serve performance over recent months? Elicia Kim slightly edges out Nagi Hanatani with 38.61% versus 37.04% in second serve points won.
  • When it comes to returning opponents' serves, Nagi Hanatani has the upper hand with 50.94% points won on second serves and 37.76% on first serves, compared to Elicia Kim's 47.40% and 26.57% respectively.
  • In high-pressure situations, Nagi Hanatani shows strength by saving 45.60% of breakpoints, outperforming Elicia Kim's 41.89%.
  • Over the last year, Elicia Kim has won 47.06% of her matches, compared to Nagi Hanatani’s 42.11% win rate, suggesting a tighter performance in matches.
  • Surface performance reveals Nagi Hanatani's best results on clay with a 46% win rate, while Elicia Kim performs best on grass, also with a 46% success rate.
  • Both players have primarily contended at the Challengers/ITF level > $10K, with Nagi winning 40.43% and Elicia 36.36% of these matches.
  • In terms of the quality of opponents faced, Elicia Kim competes against higher-ranked players with an average rank of 156.88, compared to Nagi's 407.53.
  • Nagi Hanatani shows a strong capability in deciding sets, having won 65% of them, more than Elicia Kim's 50% win rate.
  • What about converting breakpoints? Nagi Hanatani excels here, converting 43.22% of opportunities, whereas Elicia Kim manages 29.27% conversion.

Editorial Prediction (November 23, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performance patterns, Nagi Hanatani demonstrates a solid advantage in key areas such as breaking opponent serves and performing well under pressure.

Although Elicia Kim has a slight edge in second serve performance and has faced tougher opponents, she lags behind Nagi in breaking important pressure points and return games.

Given Nagi Hanatani's demonstrable ability to secure crucial breakpoints and her higher success in deciding sets, she is poised as the likely winner in the upcoming match.

Nagi Hanatani vs Elicia Kim Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Hanatani vs E. Kim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won5
0Aces (Total)1
1Total Double Faults1
1:24:42Average Match Time1:24:42
70% (14/20)1st Serve %65% (15/23)
71% (10/14)1st Serve Win %40% (6/15)
67% (4/6)2nd Serve Win %25% (2/8)
50% (3/6)Break Pts Won %100% (1/1)
65% (15/23)Return Points Win %30% (6/20)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Hanatani 42%, Kim 40%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hanatani 54%, Kim 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Hanatani 50%, Kim 42%.

N. Hanatani Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW75 Playford - 24-11-2025

Q1

AUSE. Kim
W
6-2 6-3
HardW75 Sydney - 17-11-2025

Q1

AUSR. Alame
L
6-3 6-2
HardW35 Brisbane - 27-10-2025

R1

RUSA. Bulatova
L
6-1 7-5
HardW35 Brisbane - 20-10-2025

R1

JPNN. Katsumi
L
4-6 6-4 6-3
HardW35 Darwin - 06-10-2025

R1

AUST. Kokkinis
L
7-5 6-2

E. Kim Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW75 Playford - 24-11-2025

Q1

JPNN. Hanatani
L
6-2 6-3
HardW50 Brisbane - 10-11-2025

Q1

CHNC. Yuan
L
6-2 6-0
HardW35 Brisbane - 27-10-2025

R1

NZLE. Tse
L
3-6 6-3 6-4
HardW35 Brisbane - 20-10-2025

Q3

AUST. Russell
L
7-5 6-3

Q2

AUSM. Markov
W
3-6 6-0 10-3
banner

N. Hanatani vs E. Kim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
44.70% (287/355)YTD Win/Loss40.43% (19/28)
45.24% (656/794)Sets Win/Loss41.58% (42/59)
48.17% (6373/6858)Games Win/Loss46.93% (413/467)
44.60% (161/200)Hard Win/Loss40.48% (17/25)
46.10% (65/76)Clay Win/Loss0.00% (0/1)
45.54% (46/55)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
38.46% (15/24)Grass Win/Loss50.00% (2/2)
0.02Aces Per Game0.05
138Aces Total21
0.27Double Faults Per Game0.23
1742Total Double Faults97
1:8:11Average Match Time1st Match
517.72Average Opponent Rank211.89
64% (17829/27753)1st Serve %56% (622/1118)
56% (9926/17829)1st Serve Win %57% (353/622)
42% (4189/9923)2nd Serve Win %36% (181/496)
48% (1690/3551)Break Points Won % (Total)41% (43/106)
46% (12905/27941)Return Points Win %40% (452/1135)
25.00% (2/6)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
44.24% (219/276)Challenger W/L41.18% (14/20)
47.48% (66/73)Futures W/L38.46% (5/8)
44% (281/636)Best of 3 Sets Win %39% (18/46)
100% (2/2)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/0)
59% (55/93)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)60% (3/5)
48% (82/170)Deciding Set Win %38% (3/8)
83% (297/247)1st Set Won, Won Match81% (21/17)
17% (297/50)1st Set Won, Lost Match19% (21/4)
11% (344/38)1st Set Lost, Won Match8% (26/2)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sun, 23 Nov, 09:10 PM
Prediction
MEXA. Magadan
VENJ. J. Bianchi
W1
1.27
W2
3.34
Mon, 24 Nov, 01:00 PM
Prediction
ITAG. CadenassoSE
ESPD. M. Aguilar5
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Mon, 24 Nov, 04:00 AM
Prediction
JPNR. Matsuda
AUSH. Jones
W1
1.59
W2
2.18
Mon, 24 Nov, 02:30 AM
Prediction
JPNT. Kumasaka
JPNL. Vithoontien
W1
1.48
W2
2.43
Sun, 23 Nov, 09:10 PM
Prediction
COLM. Castaneda
CANJ. Flores
W1
3.4
W2
1.26
Mon, 24 Nov, 05:30 AM
Prediction
AUSC. HewittWC
AUSP. Sekulic
W1
2.4
W2
1.49